Pubblicità
UFFICIALE PC Elite: Dangerous
- Autore discussione The_Train
- Data d'inizio
Gambit
VENDO 32 anni di VG, PM se cercate qualcosa
- Iscritto dal
- 28 Ago 2008
- Messaggi
- 30,535
- Reazioni
- 163
Offline
per colpa del temporale non riesco ad aggiornare il gioco :\
volevo farmi un giro su quella luna anche io.
quanto dista dai sistemi della principessa? Andando a memoria, l'ultima volta che loggai ero in territorio imperiale.
volevo farmi un giro su quella luna anche io.
quanto dista dai sistemi della principessa? Andando a memoria, l'ultima volta che loggai ero in territorio imperiale.
Ultima modifica da un moderatore:
Maica
Legend of forum
- Iscritto dal
- 6 Gen 2012
- Messaggi
- 17,719
- Reazioni
- 14,153
Offline
Freelance Report: Mysterious Wreck could be an Artefact of the Past
The discovery of what appears to be the remains of a non-human spacecraft has sent ripples of fear and curiosity through the galaxy.
"Many are speculating that this is evidence of recent Thargoid activity," said Professor Steven Eisler of the Okinura Xenobiology Institute, "but it's more likely that the wreckage dates from our first encounters with the Thargoids."
"What I find disturbing are the messages and clues that led to this xeno-archaeological find. Someone is deliberately preying on mankind's fear of the unknown, and they need to be held accountable for their actions."
https://community.elitedangerous.com/galnet/uid/57c6dfef9657ba7a0d46a7fb
The discovery of what appears to be the remains of a non-human spacecraft has sent ripples of fear and curiosity through the galaxy.
"Many are speculating that this is evidence of recent Thargoid activity," said Professor Steven Eisler of the Okinura Xenobiology Institute, "but it's more likely that the wreckage dates from our first encounters with the Thargoids."
"What I find disturbing are the messages and clues that led to this xeno-archaeological find. Someone is deliberately preying on mankind's fear of the unknown, and they need to be held accountable for their actions."
https://community.elitedangerous.com/galnet/uid/57c6dfef9657ba7a0d46a7fb
The_Train
Divinità
- Iscritto dal
- 18 Mar 2009
- Messaggi
- 35,264
- Reazioni
- 19,535
Online
Maica
Legend of forum
- Iscritto dal
- 6 Gen 2012
- Messaggi
- 17,719
- Reazioni
- 14,153
Offline
Votato si anch'io.
Mazza che palle sbloccare Palin. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/dsax.gif Fatti i 5k ly, ora tocca farmare i 25 Unknown Fragment. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/dsax.gif
Fatto anche i 25 frammenti, mi aspettavo un farming tedioso come i Modular Terminals invece si trovano facilmente. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/Gab3.gif
https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/51lo9a/the_actual_size_of_the_alien_ship_parts/
Mazza che palle sbloccare Palin. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/dsax.gif Fatti i 5k ly, ora tocca farmare i 25 Unknown Fragment. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/dsax.gif
Fatto anche i 25 frammenti, mi aspettavo un farming tedioso come i Modular Terminals invece si trovano facilmente. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/Gab3.gif
https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/51lo9a/the_actual_size_of_the_alien_ship_parts/
Ultima modifica da un moderatore:
Votato sì anche io, noto ora che il lead designer è italiano //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif (o almeno ha origini)
Non si sanno i risultati del sondaggio ad ora?
Ne vedremo delle belle con gli alieni //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif
Roba che il loro sidewinder terrà testa ad un player in FdL senza problema //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/250978_ahsisi.gif
In caso organizziamoci ed andiamo a caccia di alieni quando sarà il momento.
Ah io tra poco VOGLIO tassativamente il prismatic shield. Quindi se qualcuno mi aiuta a farmare merit ci mettiamo di meno e facciamo prima in 2.
Non si sanno i risultati del sondaggio ad ora?
Ne vedremo delle belle con gli alieni //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif
Roba che il loro sidewinder terrà testa ad un player in FdL senza problema //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/250978_ahsisi.gif
In caso organizziamoci ed andiamo a caccia di alieni quando sarà il momento.
Ah io tra poco VOGLIO tassativamente il prismatic shield. Quindi se qualcuno mi aiuta a farmare merit ci mettiamo di meno e facciamo prima in 2.
Dalfi
Io sono la notte
- Iscritto dal
- 13 Nov 2010
- Messaggi
- 31,099
- Reazioni
- 9,905
Offline
Si sa quando esce la nuova big-patch? Sto bramando come un pazzo lo sconto per poter ricomprare Horizons. Quanto mi sono pentito di averlo refundato. Voglio tornare nel mondo di Elite //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/sad.png
Maica
Legend of forum
- Iscritto dal
- 6 Gen 2012
- Messaggi
- 17,719
- Reazioni
- 14,153
Offline
Finito di moddare una Viper Mk IV: 33 ly di jump range, top speed: 371, boost: 468, 516 di armour coi Military Grade e si avvicina molto alla manovrabilità della Mk III. :nfox:
Vanilla era: 22 ly, top speed: 296, boost: 373 e abbastanza un mattone da manovrare.
Dirty Drive Tuning G5
Increased FSD Range G5
Lightweight Armour G3
Mi chiedo se posso sculare di più con i roll e farle raggiungere i 500 e renderla ancora più leggera e manovrabile. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/Predicatore.gif
Btw, sono atterrato ad Obsdian Orbital e la torre di controllo mi ha detto che non è un luogo sicuro, di sbrigare i miei affari e andarmene via il prima possibile. :morris82:
Vanilla era: 22 ly, top speed: 296, boost: 373 e abbastanza un mattone da manovrare.
Dirty Drive Tuning G5
Increased FSD Range G5
Lightweight Armour G3
Mi chiedo se posso sculare di più con i roll e farle raggiungere i 500 e renderla ancora più leggera e manovrabile. //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/Predicatore.gif
Btw, sono atterrato ad Obsdian Orbital e la torre di controllo mi ha detto che non è un luogo sicuro, di sbrigare i miei affari e andarmene via il prima possibile. :morris82:
Ultima modifica da un moderatore:
Obsidian Orbital dov'è?
Eh tanta roba a me manca ancora tanto per arrivare a poter fare quelle modifiche. Per ora mi accontento del mio FSD range G3 //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif
Quando avrò il 5 inizierò a modificare anche la Corvette. E li ci sarà da divertirsi contando anche le SCB, gli scudi, i plasma...
Eh tanta roba a me manca ancora tanto per arrivare a poter fare quelle modifiche. Per ora mi accontento del mio FSD range G3 //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif
Quando avrò il 5 inizierò a modificare anche la Corvette. E li ci sarà da divertirsi contando anche le SCB, gli scudi, i plasma...
Maica
Legend of forum
- Iscritto dal
- 6 Gen 2012
- Messaggi
- 17,719
- Reazioni
- 14,153
Offline
Hello Commanders!
We have the results from the ship transfer poll.
For reference, we posed a simple, two option question:
POLL: Should transferring ships and modules to your location take time?
1. No, the transfer should be instant.
2. Yes there should be a delay of 5 minutes minimum, 100 minutes to cross the human bubble, edge to edge.
As I stated in the initial post, we were already leaning fairly strongly towards having delivery times, but we wanted to get a snapshot of player sentiment to help us with our final deliberations.
39,902 people voted, of which 38,045 have validated Elite Dangerous accounts. We’d like to thank you for your participation.
Seventy percent of the vote was in favour of having delivery times.
This result has helped us confirm our decision to move away from having instant ship transfer, which we arrived at after much internal discussion, helped in part by vigorous debate on our forums, Reddit, etc.
It’s always great to be able to include feedback from you, the Commanders who play Elite: Dangerous, and we feel this has been a positive experience.
We're still pushing ahead to try and get ship transfer in for 2.2, we just don't want to guarantee it, just in case. At a guess (i.e. not to taken as the ultimate fact) if it doesn't hit 2.2 beta, it would hopefully drop in before 2.3.
We'll be finessing the final times, which might end up being a little shorter (we wanted to be as extreme as possible in the poll to make the potential consequence as clear as possible), but it will likely be in the same ball park, as these times will represent bulk freighter transport, which is not fast.
Q: Bulk Freighter NPC models?
No, sorry. It's just how we rationalise the delivery times. However, it would be cool to have visual representations of these in the future (no ETA, no guarantee).
Transporting ships to Jaques will definitely take a much longer period of time, given its great distance from the human bubble.
It's probably worth noting though that, regardless of how long the final delivery times are (they might get a little shorter than the numbers stated in the poll, but they probably won't be on the fast side), you won't have to swap ships (or buy endless amounts of Sidewinders) when retrieving a ship.
In addition, ships with small jump ranges can be transported even if they could not make jump distances required for the journey.
We're looking to implement a "sell ship remotely" feature at the same time as we add the ship transfer feature, to allow Commanders to sell ships docked in distant systems.
The delivery time would be a minimum of around five minutes, representing basic logistics of getting your ship loaded into a bulk carrier, followed by an additional time cost per light year to be travelled. The ballpark we are looking at would mean a delay of around 100 minutes if you transfered a ship from one edge of human space to the other (around 300 light years).
There would be no chance of losing ships transported by bulk freighter. Cost (in either case) will be proportional to ship value and distance to be travelled. If we end up with a delivery time, the cost will be lower than if we have instant transfer.
Although we might impose limits, theoretically very long distances could be traversed by bulk freighters, so, yes, traveling to Jaques would be possible, with an extremely long delivery time.
For clarity: the reason we are looking at ballpark figures of 5 mins to 100 minutes is two reasons:
- There's an amount of basic logistics in getting a ship booked and loaded onto a bulk freighter, hence a minimum 5 minute delay.
- We will use a X seconds per light year formula to simulate the speed of a bulk freighter.
The idea is that the delivery time can tick down regardless of whether you are playing the game or not.
We are talking about the ability to have a ship stored at a distant location transported to your current location. The same for stored modules. At no point are you (the Commander) able to fast travel - you must always manually fly a ship.
In general, the ability to fly back and pick up a ship has a few issues: that you are doing the journey twice (even if the first journey is in a faster ship) and that you are forced to leave a ship at the pick up location. In addition, your time is completely filled by the logistics task. The ability to have ships delivered, even at non-optimal jump rates, is arguably better.
Secondly, just because we currently don't have bulk freighters in the game does not mean that we won't have things like this in the future (regardless of whether we have timed or instant ship deliveries) or even that they don't exist in the lore already (I believe the concept of mega freighters has always existed in Elite lore in some way).
And although we may finesse the final times to be a little faster or slower, the concept is that these freighters are built to be able to get everywhere, with minimal crew, but not amazingly quickly.
(Responding to a question about sending a ship from your current location to a remote destination) Personally I quite like it, but it's outside of the current remit for 2.2. If we end up with timed deliveries, it sounds like the kind of thing we could consider in the future (no ETA no guarantees! //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/smile.png ).
A lot of folk have been asking about exact formulas for ship/module delivery times. The answer is that we'd have a minimum time (e.g. 5 minutes) and then extend this based on a "seconds per light year" formula, to approximate the kind of times a bulk freighter delivery system might result in. The example times I used for the poll represent the kind of times we're considering. It's possible that we might reduce them a little, but they'd likely be in that ball park, and I'd rather folk were shown the longest possible times for the poll to focus their mind on what the consequences could be.
And just to be clear, this is not "design by committee". It's a very useful way for us to take a snapshot of player sentiment a feature's details. As I stated in the initial post, we're leaning towards having a delay, but seeing that there are interesting pros and cons on both sides of the fence, we think a poll, in this instance, will provide us with useful information. The final decision, as usual, will be ours to make. Great though this poll and debate are turning out, I don't want to give the false impression that it's the "new" way of doing things. It just happens to be, in our opinion, a good thing to do at this time.
The feature "ship transfer" may come in a little hot, or delayed, based on decisions we make about how it's going to work. The community is not to blame for this! It has just created an interesting question that means we might have to take more time over than we originally thought.
Also, about the idea to allow Commanders to action ship transfer to systems other than the one they are currently at (a "push" rather than a "pull" if you will): I have stated that I personally quite like the idea, at face value. However, we haven't looked at it closely yet. Clearly, it's a significant increase in scope (anyone who says otherwise is incorrect) and we'd have to have a serious think about potential ramifications. This does not mean we will never look at it. It simply means that we aren't going to look at it for the foreseeable future. It's certainly not "the way we wished it worked".
We have the results from the ship transfer poll.
For reference, we posed a simple, two option question:
POLL: Should transferring ships and modules to your location take time?
1. No, the transfer should be instant.
2. Yes there should be a delay of 5 minutes minimum, 100 minutes to cross the human bubble, edge to edge.
As I stated in the initial post, we were already leaning fairly strongly towards having delivery times, but we wanted to get a snapshot of player sentiment to help us with our final deliberations.
39,902 people voted, of which 38,045 have validated Elite Dangerous accounts. We’d like to thank you for your participation.
Seventy percent of the vote was in favour of having delivery times.
This result has helped us confirm our decision to move away from having instant ship transfer, which we arrived at after much internal discussion, helped in part by vigorous debate on our forums, Reddit, etc.
It’s always great to be able to include feedback from you, the Commanders who play Elite: Dangerous, and we feel this has been a positive experience.
We're still pushing ahead to try and get ship transfer in for 2.2, we just don't want to guarantee it, just in case. At a guess (i.e. not to taken as the ultimate fact) if it doesn't hit 2.2 beta, it would hopefully drop in before 2.3.
We'll be finessing the final times, which might end up being a little shorter (we wanted to be as extreme as possible in the poll to make the potential consequence as clear as possible), but it will likely be in the same ball park, as these times will represent bulk freighter transport, which is not fast.
Q: Bulk Freighter NPC models?
No, sorry. It's just how we rationalise the delivery times. However, it would be cool to have visual representations of these in the future (no ETA, no guarantee).
Transporting ships to Jaques will definitely take a much longer period of time, given its great distance from the human bubble.
It's probably worth noting though that, regardless of how long the final delivery times are (they might get a little shorter than the numbers stated in the poll, but they probably won't be on the fast side), you won't have to swap ships (or buy endless amounts of Sidewinders) when retrieving a ship.
In addition, ships with small jump ranges can be transported even if they could not make jump distances required for the journey.
We're looking to implement a "sell ship remotely" feature at the same time as we add the ship transfer feature, to allow Commanders to sell ships docked in distant systems.
The delivery time would be a minimum of around five minutes, representing basic logistics of getting your ship loaded into a bulk carrier, followed by an additional time cost per light year to be travelled. The ballpark we are looking at would mean a delay of around 100 minutes if you transfered a ship from one edge of human space to the other (around 300 light years).
There would be no chance of losing ships transported by bulk freighter. Cost (in either case) will be proportional to ship value and distance to be travelled. If we end up with a delivery time, the cost will be lower than if we have instant transfer.
Although we might impose limits, theoretically very long distances could be traversed by bulk freighters, so, yes, traveling to Jaques would be possible, with an extremely long delivery time.
For clarity: the reason we are looking at ballpark figures of 5 mins to 100 minutes is two reasons:
- There's an amount of basic logistics in getting a ship booked and loaded onto a bulk freighter, hence a minimum 5 minute delay.
- We will use a X seconds per light year formula to simulate the speed of a bulk freighter.
The idea is that the delivery time can tick down regardless of whether you are playing the game or not.
We are talking about the ability to have a ship stored at a distant location transported to your current location. The same for stored modules. At no point are you (the Commander) able to fast travel - you must always manually fly a ship.
In general, the ability to fly back and pick up a ship has a few issues: that you are doing the journey twice (even if the first journey is in a faster ship) and that you are forced to leave a ship at the pick up location. In addition, your time is completely filled by the logistics task. The ability to have ships delivered, even at non-optimal jump rates, is arguably better.
Secondly, just because we currently don't have bulk freighters in the game does not mean that we won't have things like this in the future (regardless of whether we have timed or instant ship deliveries) or even that they don't exist in the lore already (I believe the concept of mega freighters has always existed in Elite lore in some way).
And although we may finesse the final times to be a little faster or slower, the concept is that these freighters are built to be able to get everywhere, with minimal crew, but not amazingly quickly.
(Responding to a question about sending a ship from your current location to a remote destination) Personally I quite like it, but it's outside of the current remit for 2.2. If we end up with timed deliveries, it sounds like the kind of thing we could consider in the future (no ETA no guarantees! //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/smile.png ).
A lot of folk have been asking about exact formulas for ship/module delivery times. The answer is that we'd have a minimum time (e.g. 5 minutes) and then extend this based on a "seconds per light year" formula, to approximate the kind of times a bulk freighter delivery system might result in. The example times I used for the poll represent the kind of times we're considering. It's possible that we might reduce them a little, but they'd likely be in that ball park, and I'd rather folk were shown the longest possible times for the poll to focus their mind on what the consequences could be.
And just to be clear, this is not "design by committee". It's a very useful way for us to take a snapshot of player sentiment a feature's details. As I stated in the initial post, we're leaning towards having a delay, but seeing that there are interesting pros and cons on both sides of the fence, we think a poll, in this instance, will provide us with useful information. The final decision, as usual, will be ours to make. Great though this poll and debate are turning out, I don't want to give the false impression that it's the "new" way of doing things. It just happens to be, in our opinion, a good thing to do at this time.
The feature "ship transfer" may come in a little hot, or delayed, based on decisions we make about how it's going to work. The community is not to blame for this! It has just created an interesting question that means we might have to take more time over than we originally thought.
Also, about the idea to allow Commanders to action ship transfer to systems other than the one they are currently at (a "push" rather than a "pull" if you will): I have stated that I personally quite like the idea, at face value. However, we haven't looked at it closely yet. Clearly, it's a significant increase in scope (anyone who says otherwise is incorrect) and we'd have to have a serious think about potential ramifications. This does not mean we will never look at it. It simply means that we aren't going to look at it for the foreseeable future. It's certainly not "the way we wished it worked".
Ultima modifica da un moderatore:
Maica
Legend of forum
- Iscritto dal
- 6 Gen 2012
- Messaggi
- 17,719
- Reazioni
- 14,153
Offline
2.2 beta martedì! 
Beta Access coming next week.
We’re thrilled to let you know that you’ll be jumping in your ship-launched fighters, taking on passenger missions, piloting the Beluga liner and experiencing the rest of the amazing list of features coming to 2.2 The Guardians this coming Tuesday 20th September.
If you’ve got the PC exclusive beta access already you’ll be able to download the beta and select it from the launcher menu as you usually would, and for those who haven’t already taken advantage of beta access, we have some good news.
If you already own horizons, or buy it now, you’ll be able to pick up beta access from the store for only £6.99 you will get beta access for 2.2, and all future updates in the Elite Dangerous: Horizons season of expansions. With Passenger gameplay, the Beluga Liner, ship transfer, new station interiors, route plotter improvements, and many quality of life improvements in 2.2 alone, now is a great time to get playing the beta and contribute to the future of the Elite Dangerous galaxy.
http://email-elitedangerous.com/3F35-B3RB-1B33X9W29D/cr.aspx
Beta Access coming next week.
We’re thrilled to let you know that you’ll be jumping in your ship-launched fighters, taking on passenger missions, piloting the Beluga liner and experiencing the rest of the amazing list of features coming to 2.2 The Guardians this coming Tuesday 20th September.
If you’ve got the PC exclusive beta access already you’ll be able to download the beta and select it from the launcher menu as you usually would, and for those who haven’t already taken advantage of beta access, we have some good news.
If you already own horizons, or buy it now, you’ll be able to pick up beta access from the store for only £6.99 you will get beta access for 2.2, and all future updates in the Elite Dangerous: Horizons season of expansions. With Passenger gameplay, the Beluga Liner, ship transfer, new station interiors, route plotter improvements, and many quality of life improvements in 2.2 alone, now is a great time to get playing the beta and contribute to the future of the Elite Dangerous galaxy.
http://email-elitedangerous.com/3F35-B3RB-1B33X9W29D/cr.aspx
ReNext
– Alpha and Omega –
- Iscritto dal
- 7 Feb 2015
- Messaggi
- 3,901
- Reazioni
- 10
Offline
Solo per curiosità, dopo aver trovato interessanti le due settimane di prova di EVE Online e dopo esser rimasto deluso da No Man's Sky sto cercando uno Space Sim (possibilmente MMO, quindi con un universo persistente) senza abbonamento mensile (motivo principale per cui ho lasciato EVE Online).
Conviene questo o aspetto Star Citizen? Quali sono le principali differenze tra i due titoli?
Mi chiedevo inoltre perché questo avesse una metascore di 66 su Steam. Ha qualche sostanziale difetto?
Conviene questo o aspetto Star Citizen? Quali sono le principali differenze tra i due titoli?
Mi chiedevo inoltre perché questo avesse una metascore di 66 su Steam. Ha qualche sostanziale difetto?
Ultima modifica da un moderatore:
Dalfi
Io sono la notte
- Iscritto dal
- 13 Nov 2010
- Messaggi
- 31,099
- Reazioni
- 9,905
Offline
L'unico difetto è che ogni 1/2 anni uscirà una nuova stagione a pagamento con contenuti più o meno rilevanti (la prima ha aggiungo l'atterraggio su pianeti privi di atmosfera tra le varie cose) e non so se alcune di queste features erano state promesse per il gioco base. Altre critiche sono dovute al fatto che Horizons inizialmente andava comprato come gioco a parte contenente anche quello base e venduto a prezzo pieno, quindi chi aveva già Elite aveva una bella mazzata.
IMHO è lo space sim definitivo. Già il fatto che riproduca la nostra galassia dovrebbe far eccitare un amante dell'astronomia //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif
Star Citizen è ancora un'incognita, spenderci ora dei soldi è sprecato dato che puoi farci ben poco. Io qui con il gioco base ho fatto oltre 100 ore e non mi sono mai annoiato, nonostante non possa sbarcare sui pianeti.
Pubblicità