Giochi Multipiattaforma, dove lo prendo? | PS4 - XONE - Switch Version | Titoli in prima pagina

[The_Train]

Eh?? //content.invisioncic.com/a283374/emoticons/emoticons_dent1005.gif

Sopra - View Distance 0% PC, sotto - PS4

Spoiler

 

[moon knight]

 

[The_Train]

Per il resto One ha una res inferiore ai 1080p, scala solo su un asse però [1536x1080]. Frame rate claudicante su One, spesso sui 25FPS, e più stabile su PS4, qualche calo presente durante le fasi all'aperto ma tiene botta. Niente anisotropico su PS4, presente sulla concorrente.

L'articolo definitivo arriverà a giorni penso, ma sotto tutti gli altri aspetti sembrano essere identiche le due versioni.

 

[DJ_Jedi]

Ma secondo me ci deve essere qualche problema con l'anisotropico su PS4, manca in parecchi giochi, ma Sony aggiorna i dev kit solo per inserire quella cagata dello Share Play...

 

[Wild]

Per quanto riguarda le differenze con Xbox one, sul Digital Foundry evidenziano che su ps4 il frame rate è più stabile, ha una risoluzione maggiore, entrambe 1080p ma su X1 e scalato dai 1536X1080p (su Ps4 i normali 1920X1080p)con il 20 % dei pixel in meno. Mentre su ps4 c'è un filtro anisotropico inferiore.

Altre immagini:

 

[luciopieracci]

nella foto Xo ci sono molti dettagli sfuocati...o meno definiti...guardate il muro rovinato sulla destra oppure lo scatolone di cartone

 

[The_Train]

nella foto Xo ci sono molti dettagli sfuocati...o meno definiti...guardate il muro rovinato sulla destra oppure lo scatolone di cartone

Throughout the experience, we noted textures loading in a bit slower on Xbox One, resulting in situations such as this where both certain object and character textures appear blurry well into a scene.

 

[ilGatsaro]

News su the witcher 3:

- CD Projekt conferma: The Witcher 3 a 1080p e 30fps su PS4 (su one confermati i 900p)

- Presenti cali di frame rate e pop-in sulla versione PS4 di The Witcher 3

Per chi ha voglia di leggere riporto le impressioni sul comparto grafico/tecnico della versione ps4:

PS4 version impressions[/color]

Console version – cards on the table

Before I go into my specific impressions of playing The Witcher 3 on Sony’s console, where I will relate to every possible area of the game let me get the most disputable thing out of the way – the graphics. For starters it’s worth to straighten out on very important thing. I mean that if someone thinks that the console version of the game will work on minimum specs is deeply wrong, and if on the other hand someone fantasizes about high to ultra, then they’re deeply wrong too. The way things look it is hard to define the graphical option on consoles(from talking to a person playing on Xbox One I found out that it’s identical there). It can be clearly seen that it’s a mixture of many different graphical levels – there are moments where it shows that the developers had to reach a compromise, but there are also those when you want to say – “hats off, dear REDS!”

But enough of that secretiveness – it’s time to put the cards on the table and relate in detail to certain elements of the game’s graphics.

The PS4 version of the game I played was running in 1080p, 30 FPS. First that draws your attention are character models that make your jaw hit the floor. You can notice every detail of the eyes, every single hair on the White Wolf’s face, wrinkles on the faces or very nicely done hair – that of course concerns every character I met in the game unless they didn’t have wrinkles. In this aspect games like Middle Earth:Shadow of Mordor, Dragon Age:Inquisition or even new GTA are being left behind and if I was to make any comparisons it would be Infamous:Second Son or its standalone add-on First Light – the level is very similar. When it comes to armour elements attention to smallest details can be noticed too – light reflexes; small shimmering metal elements; realistic material textures like leather, wood, metal or cloth fabric.

It all looks great during exploration, however not everything works perfect. From time to time – especially during gallop while horse riding – you can see objects being loaded. It’s not instrusive, the draw distance is really huge and it looks good and aforementioned pop-up applies mostly to vegetation elements. I mean bushes appearing several dozen meters ahead or some small trees. Vegetation however is so rich and dense that sometimes we won’t even notice. You can’t deny it happens but I’ll just mention that if we compare this to the really irritating object loading in GTA V on the same console – it’s better in the Witcher 3. Sometimes, especially when we die, the loading screens take a while but that shouldn’t be a problem as they are not present during the actual gameplay.

Going back to vegetation it should be noted that it’s one of the weakest points of the console version, although it depends on circuimstances and another factor. By that I pertain to its(the vegetation) amount, as it is simply everywhere. The locations designer by the REDs teem with numerous woodlets, big and dense forests, orchards, farming fields and even small gardens by the peasants huts where we’ll find some flowers. There’s a lot of this stuff and it doesn’t always go in pair with high level of detail and here I mean mostly grass – the rest turns out pretty good. The overall impression however is made better by weather effects and physics. When vegetation so lush dances in the wind it looks marvelous, intensifies the immersion and makes us experience it differently. As far as physics is concerned, the undergrowth is not indifferent and immovable of course when we scramble through tchem and there’s always something bending or being trampled by a Witcher’s boot.

Another thing are textures, which are a mixed bag. Worry not however, there’s no pixelitis on the screen, unless there are situations when something doesn’t load, mostly while transitioning from a cutscene to quick action. Texture quality is decent and high resolution adds its 2 cents. Of course, it’s not all as sharp as in the PC version that I got to play a dozen or so minutes before the presentation end, but the difference is not as big as one would expect.

Coming slowly to the end of the subject that can cause a mutiny and uprising I would like to mention other aspects of graphics that TW3 boasts on PS4. Everything about the water looks awesome – the river is natural, underwater sights are wonderful and a pleasure to explore; wet surfaces look, well…like wet surfaces. Additionally, when we go out of the water to the shore we can observe Geralt being really wet, as drops and small streams are going down his face and armour elements even reflecting in the sun.

However, there’s another element that - among the overall „mid-to-high” graphical fidelity -evoked a feeling of total wonder and brought back nice memories from a beloved game that I spent a lot of time with a few years ago. It’s about the graphical arrangement of shining sun – the effects simply brings you to your knees. Sun beams literally hit your eyes, go through tree branches and sometimes can even blind you with their intensity. During a chat with Tadek Zielinski in the studio’s cantine Far Cry 2 from 2008 was mentioned when this subject was brought up. I have a lot of fond memories of that game and its upgraded showcase being present in the Witcher 3 gave me a really pleasant feeling. Traveling through wilderness on Roach’s back in the glare of the sunset – that’s right, we finally live to see it and Geralt needed it for a long time.

To end this part of the article I would like to talk about fluidity, playability and overall impression of experiencing the console version of TW3 based on strictly technical issues. The game doesn’t suffer from noticeable frame rate drops, at least ones that would hinder the gameplay filled with moments of dynamic action. When asked, he studio rep that was watching me play for almost the whole presentation admitted that there’s a lot to fix and not everything works as it should. Possibly it’s about the larger locations because in the hub I got to play there were some little drops but in very specific moments – the aforementioned transition from a cutscene to quick action which was accompanied by textured popping in. This area of development needs some specific polishing however those were mostly 1-2 second moments. During combat or exploration almost everything works correctly and you can derive full pleasure from gameplay. From time to time there are bugs – it happened a few times but nothing totally unexpected, as even the devs knew what will happen and reacted immediately, knowing the build well. TW3 on PS4 is fully playable as of now and satisfactorily optimized although it needs a little more time to get it in order. Bugs are obvious but when it comes to graphics – it’s not bad, it can really surprise with quality at times. But due to the fact that it seems to be a mix of different graphical settings it’s a little uneven, so more time is needed to make it even according to the rule: “remove where it can’t be seen, where it can be seen – add”.

The graphics subject is behind us and one would almost want to shout “praise Melitele” as now we can take care of all the rest, and believe me – there’s a lot to write about. Announcing the further part of the article I will allow myself to quote Michael Buffer’s part when he announced the most famous boxing champions before they enter the ring: “Let’s get ready to rumble!”.

In attesa di conoscere le performance della versione xbox one.

 

[Wild]

Inutile postarlo ora, quando il gioco è ancora work in progress, da quello che ho letto in giro pare che sia poco ottimizzato pure su PC, i cali evidenti, soprattutto sotto la neve ci sono pure su X1. C'è bisogno di lavorare maggiormente su ps4.

Speriamo che questi 4 mesi di ottimizzazione (dove hanno detto che lavoreranno solo su quello) siano utili.

 

[ilGatsaro]

Inutile postarlo ora, quando il gioco è ancora work in progress, da quello che ho letto in giro pare che sia poco ottimizzato pure su PC, i cali evidenti, soprattuto sotto la neve ci sono pure su X1. C'è bisogno di lavorare maggiormente su ps4.Speriamo che questi 4 mesi di ottimizzazione (dove hanno detto che lavoreranno solo su quello) siano utili.

I CD Projekt sono gente seria e lo dimostra la versione consolara di the witcher 2.

 

[The_Train]

Per il resto One ha una res inferiore ai 1080p, scala solo su un asse però [1536x1080]. Frame rate claudicante su One, spesso sui 25FPS, e più stabile su PS4, qualche calo presente durante le fasi all'aperto ma tiene botta. Niente anisotropico su PS4, presente sulla concorrente.L'articolo definitivo arriverà a giorni penso, ma sotto tutti gli altri aspetti sembrano essere identiche le due versioni.

E' uscito il face off e sono stati confermati pregi e difetti di cui sopra.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-dying-light-face-off

Rispetto alla versione PC è venuto fuori che, oltre quanto detto qualche giorno fa, han tagliato anche parecchie fonti di luce.

On as close to console-level settings as we can get, a Core i3 PC with a GTX 750 Ti managed a console-like 30fps at 1080p.

As things stand, anyone with an interest in the game should be able to enjoy it on any of the three platforms. Between the two console versions we definitely have to give the nod to the PS4 version with its improved frame-rate and better texture streaming, its higher resolution, and a near complete lack of screen-tear. However, anyone with a decent gaming PC should definitely stick to the computer version as it offers excellent scalability alongside further improved visuals.

Sull'aniso han sorvolato ma la sua assenza è un pugno negli occhi in termini di IQ.

 

[xICHIGOx]

E' uscito il face off e sono stati confermati pregi e difetti di cui sopra.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-dying-light-face-off

Rispetto alla versione PC è venuto fuori che, oltre quanto detto qualche giorno fa, han tagliato anche parecchie fonti di luce.

Sull'aniso han sorvolato ma la sua assenza è un pugno negli occhi in termini di IQ.

La versione PC non è manco da postare qua dentro visto che è solo da considerare la differenza tra le versioni console.

Meglio per PS4: Performance migliori, texture load migliore e risoluzione maggiore. Su X1 parecchio tearing, diversi cali sui 25fps anche per sessioni continuative ma ha l'anisotropico.

 

[Wild]

Certo che graficamente quel filtro anisotropico a 2X su ps4 è proprio improponibile. Per me ammazza molto la grafica...

Sinceramente io ho visto il gioco in streaming e l'ho notato, mi da parecchio fastidio, figuriamoci a 1080p. Si nota sopratutto sull'autrostrada, basta guardare la linea bianca che compare più definitiva a pochi metri quando ci muoviamo. Ripeto su Ps4 è improponibile mettere un filtro anisotropico cosi basso, soprattuto quando su X1 è più alto.

Non sono uno che si fissa su stè cose, ma purtroppo questa è una cosa che non riesco a non notare. Era cosi su ps3 (512MB), ma ritrovarselo pure su Ps4 (8 GB).... non dico l'impostazione massima, ma almeno qualcosa di più decente. (che poi non mi sembra un filtro particolarmente pesante, soprattutto con quella RAM)

Analizzando nel complesso, da quello che si vede, alla fine per nitidezza della risoluzione (anche se sporcata dal flitro anisotropico) e soprattuto per prestazioni, sempre meglio la versione Ps4.

 

[The_Train]

A quanto pare la beta di Hardline è a 900p su PS4 ed a 720p su One, just like BF4.

Battlefield Hardline may not hit its 1080p target on PS4 and Xbox One, according to new comments reportedly made by EA.
In a statement provided to Australian site Games.on.net, EA states that Visceral is now aiming to get the PS4 and Xbox One versions of Hardline "playing at 60 FPS using the same resolution settings as [battlefield 4]".

While VideoGamer.com had been unable to determine the resolution of today's beta at the time of writing, comments online point to worse-than-expected visuals, with Xbox One users complaining of a "sub 720p" resolution and "murky textures

UPDATE: In a statement provided to VideoGamer.com, an EA representative said: "This was said in an interview with Australian press, but we don’t have any further comment on the subject."

Videogamer.com

PS4 sopra, One sotto:

Spoiler

Queste due PS4:

Spoiler

 

[Loris]

A quanto pare la beta di Hardline è a 900p su PS4 ed a 720p su One, just like BF4.




Videogamer.com

PS4 sopra, One sotto:

Spoiler

Queste due PS4:

Spoiler

Sono peggio di BF 2 . Orrenda la grafica.

 

[The_Train]

Su B3D han fatto la conta dei pixel, quindi sulla res di questa build penso ci siano pochi dubbi.

 

[Loris]

Su B3D han fatto la conta dei pixel, quindi sulla res di questa build penso ci siano pochi dubbi.

Ma a parte la res che grafica è mai questa :

Scherziamo ? Su One è pure peggio santa madonna.

 

[SolidSnake91]

Io la sto scaricando, certo che è brutto eh

 

[Major Tom]

Il frostbite mi pare che fosse piuttosto leggero su PC, strano che su console non riescano a raggiungere i 1080p insieme ai 60 fps. I 1080p li hanno raggiunti solo in Inquisition su PS4 ma a 30 fps, neanche tanto rock solid a dire il vero...

 

[SolidSnake91]

Fatto 3 partite alla beta, mio ***